I'll leave you to make the judgement but on the one hand Obama this past Monday gave a speech about "pay-as-you-go", not spending money we don't have, and "fiscal responsibility". At the same time, he's proposing more mortgage bailouts and a $4 Trillion budget with 9,000 earmarks costing each taxpayer $25,000 in additional taxes. How do he and congress get away with such falsehoods and clear contradictions in so small a windows of time?
And what about the great Nancy Pelosi who promised no more earmarks? Why hasn't anyone in the media asked her why the 9,000 earmarks in the recent budget (and many more that were in the phony stimulus plan) should not be considered evidence of blatant lies told to the American public? And have they asked Obama the same related to the apparent contradiction between his comments about "fiscal responsibility" and "pay-go" and the wasteful spending bills filled with earmarks and very little to create jobs (both socialist stimulus and the $4 Trillion budget)?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
What do you think? I invite your comments. Please leave intelligible, informed comments and keep it civilized (i.e., no name calling, no foul language, etc.). For now, we will be reviewing comments to see if “going on the honor system” might be feasible at a later date.